Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moishe's Bagel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was SPEEDY KEEP, per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 02:42, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Moishe's Bagel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:MUSIC - no secondary, non-trivial, reliable sources. Dalejenkins | 21:28, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Of course, before you nominated this, you did search for ref's yourself, because it only took 30 sec to find The Daily Telegraph; [1] and The Guardian; [2] quotes. Just because an article doesn't have references doesn't mean it should be deleted, it just means it doesn't have references. Passes WP:MUSIC#C1. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 22:32, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep per WP:SNOW. The above response is absolutely devastating to the case for deletion.--S Marshall Talk/Cont 00:01, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable band. Article needs work, but no reason to delete.--Michig (talk) 10:42, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep, as we shouldn't attempt to have articles deleted simply because they need a little work. H2O Shipper 01:32, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.