Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cardiff Bay Yacht Club
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 04:35, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Cardiff Bay Yacht Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Appears to be copy of http://www.cbyc.co.uk/theclub.html; however, CSD was removed by Admin as not being a copyvio. I still think a Speedy is warranted, but will defer to community. ttonyb (talk) 23:16, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this organization. Joe Chill (talk) 21:01, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 22:59, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 04:33, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As with the other Cardiff-related articles, there is no evidence of notability. Flowanda | Talk 08:56, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment As the original Author of this article, I feel that the Club is Notable as it is one of the largest Clubs in Wales, and hosts numerous National Championships etc, along with National Training events. It is the main Sailing Sports Venue in South Wales. On a minor note, this article was nominated because tTony thought it was a copyright violation, not as a non-notable organisation so surely shouldnt that be the main discussion? Happysailor (Talk) 23:42, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 18:11, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep 58 gnews hits seem to indicate some notability UltraMagnusspeak 20:37, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Google hits don't show notability. Joe Chill (talk) 23:28, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Google news tends to only show coverage in reliable sources, hence gnews hits tend to indicate that it passes wp:gng --UltraMagnusspeak 10:34, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment – Numbers alone do not tell the story. There is a big difference between trivial and significant coverage. ttonyb (talk) 11:14, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Google news tends to only show coverage in reliable sources, hence gnews hits tend to indicate that it passes wp:gng --UltraMagnusspeak 10:34, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Google hits don't show notability. Joe Chill (talk) 23:28, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:CORP and WP:N. While news items can be a clue that something is notable, the existence of those hits do not indicate that the subject is notable. Likewise a lack of news hits does not indicate that a subject is not notable. Vegaswikian (talk) 00:23, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.